|
How many time-domain samples do we need
to capture f? As there are no restriction on the frequencies in
f, it is not at all bandlimited; any of the 256 components of the DFT
can be nonzero. The Shannon/Nyquist theory then says that to recover
this signal (via linear "sinc'' interpolation), we will need to
have all 256 samples in the time domain.
Of course, we will not be able to "fill
in" the missing samples using sinc interpolation (or any other kind
of linear method).
|
||
![]() Recovered signal, frequency domain |
||
| In general, if there are B sinusoids in
the signal, we will be able to recover using L1 minimization from on the
order of B log N samples (see the "Robust
Uncertainty Principles..." paper for a full exposition). The framework is easily extended to more general types of measurements (in place of time-domain samples), and more general types of sparsity (rather than sparisty in the frequency domain). Suppose that instead of taking K samples in the time domain, we project the signal onto a randomly chosen K dimensional subspace. Then if f is B sparse is a known orthobasis, and K is on the order of B log N, f can be recovered without error by solving an l1 minimization problem. Here is an example. The 1 megapixel image below has a perfectly sparse wavelet exapansion; it is a superposition of 25,000 Daubechies-8 wavelets.
Instead of observing this image directly, say we took 100,000 "random measurements", i.e. we are given the projection onto a 96,000 subspace. Then we look for the image whose wavelet transform has the smallest L1 norm that has the same projection onto this subspace (the measurements agree with what we have observed). The result is below; as we can see the image has been reconstructed perfectly. ![]() The lesson here is that the number of measurements needed to acquire this image is not dictated by the resolution (1 million pixels), but rather by its inherent complexity (25k non-zero wavelets). In the "real world", signals and images are not perfectly sparse, and there is always some degree of uncertainty in the measurements. Fortunately, the recovery procedure can be made robust to these types of perturbations (see the stability and statistical estimation papers for details). Another example in imaging is given below: we observe 25,000 random measurements of the 65,536 pixel image below, and quantize them to 1 digit (that is, one of 10 predefined levels). The recovery (which is performed by solving a relaxed recovery problem, see stability for details) has an error that is on the same order as the quantization error. Despite being very nonlinear, the recovery procedure is exceptionally robust. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
65k pixel image
|
25k random measurements
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
quantized measurements
|
recovered image
|
|
The L1-MAGIC package includes MATLAB code that solves these (and other) recovery problems. |
||